HKSAR v. Lau Sui on
Read the full judgment text of CACC 356/2002 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 3 June 2003.
1. There are two applications before the court:- an application for leave to appeal against conviction and an application for leave to appeal against sentence out of time.
|
CACC000356/2002 CACC 356/2002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 356 OF 2002 (ON APPEAL FROM HCCC 48 OF 2002) ______________
______________ Coram: Hon Stuart-Moore VP, Yeung and Ma JJA in Court Date of Hearing: 3 June 2003 Date of Judgment: 3 June 2003 _______________ J U D G M E N T _______________ Ma JA (giving the judgment of the Court): 1.There are two applications before the court:- an application for leave to appeal against conviction and an application for leave to appeal against sentence out of time. 2.Written grounds of appeal were set out in the various notices of application. In relation to the application for leave to appeal against conviction, nothing in the written grounds (which have not been supplemented this morning) persuades us that there exists any arguable case for leave to be given. In relation to the application for leave to appeal against sentence out of time, we first see no reason for extending time. The explanation given does not justify an extension. Secondly, and more importantly, there are no merits in the application itself. 3.In these circumstances, we dismiss both applications.
Representation: Mr Vincent Wong, SGC, of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent. Applicant in person. |