Read the full judgment text of HCLA 000008/2001 on BabelCite. This HCLA judgment was delivered on 28 May 2001.
1. The first two grounds are inter-related and are to be dealt with together. The defendant does not argue against the Presiding Officer's holding that clause [2] of the 1997 Agreement was void. What is sought to be argued is that the Presiding Officer erred in holding that clauses [1] and [3] are wholly void.