The Queen v. Lam Tak Kin

Read the full judgment text of HCMA 217/1992 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 5 May 1992.

1. The appellant was convicted of careless driving by Mr Li at San Po Kong Magistrates Court. He was fined $2,000 and disqualified for 12 months. He now appeals against the latter order, having abandoned his appeal against conviction.

Case No.HCMA 217/1992
Court
High Court CFI
Date05 May 1992
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMA000217/1992

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

( Appellate Jurisdiction )

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 217 OF 1992

-----------------------

BETWEEN

THE QUEEN

Respondent

AND

LAM TAK KIN

Appellant

-----------------------

Coram: Hon. Bewley J. In Court

Date of hearing: 5 May 1992

Date of delivery of judgment: 5 May 1992

----------------------

J U D G M E N T

----------------------

1. The appellant was convicted of careless driving by Mr Li at San Po Kong Magistrates Court. He was fined $2,000 and disqualified for 12 months. He now appeals against the latter order, having abandoned his appeal against conviction.

2. It was a bad case of careless driving; indeed the magistrate took the view that the charge should have been reckless driving. A KMB bus was pulling out of a bus stop when the appellant turned left across its front, causing the bus driver to brake sharply, which in turn caused a head injury to a passenger who had just boarded.

3. The appellant however does not have a bad traffic record. He has one previous conviction for driving without licence and insurance in 1982. In these circumstances I feel the disqualification period is too long. The appeal is allowed and the disqualification reduced to three months.

(E. de B. Bewley)
Judge of the High Court

Representation:

Miss M. Ip, Senior Crown Counsel, for Crown

Appellant in person