David Morter v. HKSAR
Read the full judgment text of FAMC 33/2003 on BabelCite. This FAMC judgment was delivered on 18 February 2004.
1. Reasonable as always, Mr Cheung has indicated that the prosecution does not oppose leave to appeal and will not oppose the appeal itself. In such circumstances, we order as follows. Leave to appeal is granted. The hearing of the appeal is fixed for 10 a.m. on 10 March 2004. It is deemed that a notice of appeal has been served by Mr Morter in respect of the bind-over and cost orders made against him. The requirement for printed cases is dispensed with. The court accepts, and expresses its than
|
FAMC000033/2003 FAMC No. 33 of 2003 IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 33 OF 2003 (CRIMINAL) (ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL _____________________
_____________________ Appeal Committee: Mr Justice Bokhary PJ, Mr Justice Chan PJ and Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ Date of Hearing: 18 February 2004 Date of Determination: 18 February 2004 _________________________________ DETERMINATION _________________________________ Mr Justice Bokhary PJ: 1.Reasonable as always, Mr Cheung has indicated that the prosecution does not oppose leave to appeal and will not oppose the appeal itself. In such circumstances, we order as follows. Leave to appeal is granted. The hearing of the appeal is fixed for 10 a.m. on 10 March 2004. It is deemed that a notice of appeal has been served by Mr Morter in respect of the bind-over and cost orders made against him. The requirement for printed cases is dispensed with. The court accepts, and expresses its thanks for, the prosecution's undertaking to prepare and provide the record, consisting of a single part, within one week from today.
Representation: Mr David Morter, the applicant in person, present Mr Cheung Wai-sun and Miss Rosaline Leung Sun-yee (of the Department of Justice) for the respondent |