The Director of Immigration v. Lau Fong

Read the full judgment text of FAMV 14/2003 on BabelCite. This FAMV judgment was delivered on 17 July 2003 before Chief Justice Li, Mr Justice Bokhary PJ, Mr Justice Chan PJ.

1. There are arguable points of general and public importance and we grant leave to appeal. On the appeal, all points would have to be ventilated, including the various possible statutory powers to deal with alleged fraud and in relation each of them, the appropriate procedure, the standard of satisfaction by the decision maker and the standard of judicial intervention.

Legal issues: Leave to appeal on points of general and public importance

Outcome: Leave to appeal granted.

Cited by 1 case

Case No.FAMV 14/2003
Court
FAMV
Date17 Jul 2003
JudgeChief Justice Li, Mr Justice Bokhary PJ, Mr Justice Chan PJ
Case Document
100%Judiciary

FAMV000014/2003

FAMV No.14 of 2003

IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 14 OF 2003 (CIVIL)

(ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM CACV NO. 287 OF 2000)

_____________________

Between:
THE DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION Applicant
AND
LAU FONG Respondent

_____________________

Appeal Committee: Chief Justice Li, Mr Justice Bokhary PJ and Mr Justice Chan PJ

Date of Hearing: 17 July 2003

Date of Determination: 17 July 2003

_____________________________

DETERMINATION

_____________________________

Chief Justice Li:

1.There are arguable points of general and public importance and we grant leave to appeal. On the appeal, all points would have to be ventilated, including the various possible statutory powers to deal with alleged fraud and in relation each of them, the appropriate procedure, the standard of satisfaction by the decision maker and the standard of judicial intervention.

2.We note that the Respondent is on legal aid. Legal Aid should continue and despite Mr Pun's ability, the Director of Legal Aid would presumably consider it appropriate to instruct leading counsel on a matter of such importance.

3.We note Mr Pannick has stated that the Director of Immigration is bound by the Court of Appeal's judgment. Therefore, the Respondent would have the right to enter Hong Kong after travelling outside Hong Kong on the basis of the present extant permission to stay which I believe would only expire in early 2005.

(Andrew Li) (Kemal Bokhary) (Patrick Chan)
Chief Justice Permanent Judge Permanent Judge

Representation:

Mr David Pannick QC and Mr William Marshall SC (instructed by the Department of Justice) for the applicant

Mr Hectar Pun (instructed by Messrs Patrick Wu & Co. and assigned by the Legal Aid Department) for the respondent

Cited by 1 case

Other judgments that cite this case