Read the full judgment text of on BabelCite. was delivered on 13 May 1987.
1. This is an application for leave to amend the substituted statement of claim in the terms of the summons. It is resisted as to what have been called Items 2 and 3 by the defendants but not as to Item 1. That means in the substituted statement of claim, paragraph 28(27), the proposed sub-paragraph 1 is not resisted but paragraphs 2 and 3 and consequentially part of the rest of the proposed amendment are resisted.