Read the full judgment text of HCA 009465/1983 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 19 July 1984.
1. The Plaintiff firm, according to the Amended Statement of Claim, is a decoration company (sic), and according to its sole proprietor, it is engaged in advertising and interior decoration. The 1st Defendant was at all material times an interior designer, and the 2nd Defendant, which, in reality, is the 1st Defendant in the guise of a limited company, is and was at all material times an interior designer. This action concerns work done at the home of Mr. Roderick Woo at Flat 12B, 56 Macdonnell