Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 007594/1975 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment.
1. The Plaintiff is claiming possession of the suit premises on the basis that the premises are business premises while the Defendant contests the olaim on the grounds that the user of the premises is primarily residential and hence the tenancy is a protected tenancy by virtue of the provisions contained in the Landlord and Tenant Ordinance Cap. 7. Both parties were legally represented and agreed that the issue should be confined to this point.