Read the full judgment text of HCMA 001216/1988 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 13 January 1989.
1. The first appellant, TSE Yuk-ming was charged with three charges of false accounting contrary to section 19(1)(b) of the Theft Ordinance. The second appellant, who was an employee of the first appellant, was jointly charged with him in respect of one charge referred to as Charge B. Both of them pleaded not guilty before Mr. Evans, a magistrate and the trial proceeded. At the commencement of the trial, Mr. McCoy who appeared for the appellants both here and below, made a number of applications