Read the full judgment text of CACC 000383/1983 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment.
1. The appellants in this case were charged before the magistrate with a variety of different charges in relation to a gambling establishment. The 1st appellant was charged that he did assist in the management of a gambling establishment; the 2nd, 3rd and 4th appellants were charged in that they did assist in the operation of a gambling establishment; and the remaining appellants were charged that they did gamble in a gambling establishment.