HKSAR v. Gulapa Adelaida

Read the full judgment text of HCMA 246/1998 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 28 May 1998.

1. The Appellant appeals against sentences imposed in the Magistracy on charges of Theft (a shoplifting) and a breach of a Deportation Order. In respect of the charge of theft she was sentenced to 6 months' imprisonment and in respect of the breach of Deportation Order she was sentenced to 15 months' imprisonment; the Magistrate ordered that those sentences ran concurrently.

Case No.HCMA 246/1998
Court
High Court CFI
Date28 May 1998
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMA000246/1998

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 246 OF 1998

_______________

BETWEEN
HKSAR Respondent
AND
Gulapa Adelaida Appellant

________________

Coram: The Hon. Madam Justice Beeson in Court

Date of Hearing: 28 May 1998

Date of Delivery of Judgment: 28 May 1998

________________

J U D G M E N T

________________

1. The Appellant appeals against sentences imposed in the Magistracy on charges of Theft (a shoplifting) and a breach of a Deportation Order. In respect of the charge of theft she was sentenced to 6 months' imprisonment and in respect of the breach of Deportation Order she was sentenced to 15 months' imprisonment; the Magistrate ordered that those sentences ran concurrently.

2. The Magistrate adopted 18 months as the starting point for his sentence on the breach of Deportation Order; this was the third breach of a deportation order by this Appellant. She had 6 other aliases by which she was known in Hong Kong and they appear on her Criminal Record Summary. The theft was a serious shoplifting involving a large quantity of shirts taken from a chain store in Hong Kong. It appears from her record and antecedents that this Appellant comes to Hong Kong for the purposes of theft.

3. The sentences are entirely proper. I see no reason to interfere with the Magistrate's sentence in either case and in fact I add 2 months to the sentence in respect of the Theft to be consecutive to the other sentence. This is an entirely unmeritorious appeal; it is dismissed.

Representation:

Paul Ho, S.G.C., for DPP

Gulapa Adelaida, Appellant, in person

(C.M. Beeson)
Judge of the Court of First Instance