Wong Hei Man Patrick v. Wong Kin Leung

Read the full judgment text of HCA 11881/1995 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 15 September 1997.

1. I heard argument on this appeal first on July 29 th . I adjourned the hearing as it appeared to me that the plaintiff might have been prejudiced by the defendant obtaining a default judgment when there was apparently an O.14 appeal.

Case No.HCA 11881/1995
Court
High Court CFI
Date15 Sep 1997
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCA011881/1995

1995, No.A11881

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HONG KONG

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

_______________

BETWEEN
WONG HEI MAN PATRICK trading as HSIN HING LOONG (a firm) Plaintiff
and
WONG KIN LEUNG also known as AH BOW and also known as FONG KIN LEUNG Defendant

_______________

Coram: Hon Sears J. in Chambers

Dates of hearing: 29 July and 15 September 1997

Date of judgment: 15 September 1997

_______________

J U D G M E N T

_______________

1. I heard argument on this appeal first on July 29th. I adjourned the hearing as it appeared to me that the plaintiff might have been prejudiced by the defendant obtaining a default judgment when there was apparently an O.14 appeal.

2. At today's hearing I have read the affidavits filed and listened to further submissions, as well as the written submissions.

3. I consider that the judgment entered in the counterclaim was regularly obtained.

4. The plaintiff is adopting delaying tactics, there appears to be an admission to this claim. I can find no proven defence to the claim for $1,371,827.40.

5. The appeal is allowed. The charging order remains. Costs of the appeal be to the Defendant.

(R.A.W. Sears)
Judge of the Court of First Instance,
High Court

Representation:

Miss Teresa Cheng, inst'd by M/s K.B. Chau & Co., for Plaintiff

Mr Lawrence Ng, inst'd by M/s Gallant Y.T. Ho & Co., for Defendant