Read the full judgment text of HCA 11244/1996 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 6 March 2003.
1. Subsequent to my earlier ruling of 6 March 2003 (among other things) giving leave to the Defendant to further amend his Re-amended Defence to enable him to rely on qualified privilege in relation to the second letter, the Plaintiff asks for an adjournment so as to amend his pleading (which probably is intended to refer to the filing and serving of a Reply to plead malice) and to consider whether further evidence is necessary: reliance is placed on Hong Kong Civil Procedure 2002 , para. 20/8/1
Cites 1 case