Read the full judgment text of CACC 000368/1985 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment.
1. The Applicant and two other men were charged with two offences. The first being blackmail of one LAM Ho-fat: the unwarranted demand being the sum of $20,000, and the second the false imprisonment also of Mr. Lam. The two other accused who were LAM Kam-chau, D1, and CHU Yee-cheung, D3, the Applicant was D2 (and I shall refer to them for clarity in that fashion), were additionally charged with an assault occasioning actual bodily harm upon Mr. Lam. D2 was convicted and sentenced to a total of 9