Read the full judgment text of CACC 000417/1985 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment.
1. Both appellants in this case were convicted on 13th September last of conspiracy to rob, contrary to Common Law. The cases against both of the defendants were largely founded on confessions which were alleged by the prosecution to have been made voluntarily by both of them. In the case of the 1st appellant he made no less than six statements over a period of two days from 19th to 21st June. In the case of the 2nd appellant, he made two statements both on 22nd June. Long voire dires were condu