The Queen v. Lee Yiu-kwong (D1) and Another
Read the full judgment text of on BabelCite..
1. When we allowed the appeal of the first defendant, LEE Yiu-kwong, on the 19th December, 1984 and reduced the period of disqualification from 3 years to 9 months, we said we would give our reasons later. This was unfortunately overlooked at the time of delivery of judgment in the appeal against conviction and sentence in the case of the second defendant.
|
CACC000444A/1984 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Criminal Appeal No. 444 of 1984 BETWEEN
________________ Coram: Roberts, C.J., McMullin, V.-P. & Silke, J.A. Date of hearing: 19th, 20th December, 1984. Date of judgment: 11th January, 1985 Date of handing down: 6th February, 1985. ___________ JUDGMENT ___________ McMullin, V.-P. : 1. When we allowed the appeal of the first defendant, LEE Yiu-kwong, on the 19th December, 1984 and reduced the period of disqualification from 3 years to 9 months, we said we would give our reasons later. This was unfortunately overlooked at the time of delivery of judgment in the appeal against conviction and sentence in the case of the second defendant. 2. The Court was of the opinion that Lee, the driver, having received an immediate custodial sentence of 6 months, the period of disqualification was excessive. The Court took into account the following facts:
Representation: Mr. Desmond Keane, Q.C. & J. Lee (Jenkins & Au) for 1st Defendant. Mr. J. Swaine, Q.C. & Miss J. Leong (W.I. Cheung & Co.) for 2nd Defendant. Mr. G. McCoy & Mr. Ridgwey for Respondent/Crown. |