Read the full judgment text of CACC 501/1984 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment.
1. Both D1 (the 1st appellant) and D3 (the 2nd appellant) apply for leave to appeal against conviction for murder. For the sake of convenience, and by agreement of counsel for all parties, we took D3's application before Dl's, for it is quite clear from the evidence that if D3's conviction is set aside, it necessarily follows that D1's conviction must also be set aside. Indeed the judge said in his summing up: