Read the full judgment text of CACC 000166/1985 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment.
1. Any person who is proved or presumed, by admission or otherwise, to have had in his possession more than five packets containing either alone or contained in a preparation, mixture, extract or other material a salt of an ester of morphine is in what we might well describe as a parlous situation when charged under section 7(1) of the Dangerous Drugs Ordinance since, until the contrary is proved, that person is presumed to have had the dangerous drug in his possession for the purposes of traffi