Read the full judgment text of CACC 000405/1973 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment.
1. The appellant faced three summonses issued upon informations alleging that he, being the proprietor, publisher and editor of a newspaper for distributing to the public, namely Kam Yeh Pao, did publish in the said newspaper specified matters of an obscene nature contrary to s.4 of the Indecent Exhibitions Ordinance, Cap. 150. That section reads: