Read the full judgment text of CACV 000192/1984 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment.
1. I shall not repeat what I said on 14th February. The claim was in trespass and in nuisance. The judge dealt only with the claim in trespass. On the facts as now agreed before us there was no trespass, although there had been a trespass some years ago. Before us the case was argued on the basis of nuisance. Clearly the judgment could not stand on the basis of a trespass. We took no objection to the argument as it was presented, because the parties were both unrepresented and we treated the mat