Read the full judgment text of on BabelCite..
1. The 1st defendant and the plaintiff are brothers. The plaintiff is junior to the lst defendant. From November 1982 to March 1984, the plaintiff was absent from this territory. In that period of absence, the younger brother gained the status of a Canadian investor immigrant on account of his disclosed sizeable assets. The possessions of the younger brother were summarized in his evidence. The younger brother, enjoyed a comfortable finance base. At the end of 1982, there was a need for the elde