Read the full judgment text of HCMA 000039/1985 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment.
1. The Appellant was convicted on three charges of offences against section 40(1)(b) of the Objectionable Publications Ordinance ("the Ordinance"). Two of the charges related to the offence of publishing an objectionable article and the other to the offence of having for publication for gain objectionable articles. All the objectionable articles were video tapes containing matter of an obscene nature.