Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 005700/1984 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment.
1. This is an application by the defendant for rather extensive amendments to its Defence and Counterclaim to which application Mr. Yu strenuously and ably objected on the ground that the amendment would bring in at this rather late stage two fresh matters and these are fraudulent misrepresentation and the suggestion for the first time that offer was made to pack the goods in Beijing.