Read the full judgment text of HCA 008172/1984 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment.
1. The Plaintiff in this case sues upon a dishonoured cheque. The facts are unusual. The Plaintiff is a proprietor of a garment factory. In the course of his trade he came to know one Lau Chuen, who was the proprietor of another garment factory. Lau Chuen did some sub-contracting work for the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff has known Lau Chuen for about three years and regards him as an acquaintance. Lau Chuen last did some work for the Plaintiff in 1983, but they subsequently remained in contact.