HKSAR v. Lau Yiu Ming
Read the full judgment text of HCMA 432/2004 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 25 May 2004.
1. The Appellant has put forward very detailed and lengthy submissions in respect of his appeal against his two convictions: one for failing to comply with a traffic signal; and the other of driving a motor vehicle with an alcohol concentration in breath which exceeded the prescribed limit. I have given careful consideration to all his submissions. Having considered them and having considered what the Magistrate said in his Statement of Findings, I am of the view that the Magistrate was entitled
|
HCMA000432/2004 HCMA 432/2004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 432 OF 2004 (ON APPEAL FROM FLCC 409/2004) ____________
____________ Coram: The Honourable Mrs Justice V. Bokhary in Court Date of Hearing: 25 May 2004 Date of Judgment: 25 May 2004 _______________ J U D G M E N T _______________ 1.The Appellant has put forward very detailed and lengthy submissions in respect of his appeal against his two convictions: one for failing to comply with a traffic signal; and the other of driving a motor vehicle with an alcohol concentration in breath which exceeded the prescribed limit. I have given careful consideration to all his submissions. Having considered them and having considered what the Magistrate said in his Statement of Findings, I am of the view that the Magistrate was entitled to convict the Appellant of both offences, and that there is no basis on which I can interfere with either conviction. 2.This appeal is, therefore, dismissed.
Representation: Miss June CHEUNG, GC, of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent Appellant in person |