Read the full judgment text of HCMA 000665/1985 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment.
1. In this case one Ah Man who is not before the court, while accompanied by the appellant, accused 3 other boys i.e. the 3 Prosecution Witnesses of stepping upon and damaging his shoes. Ah Man then got them to accompany him and the appellant to King's Park where he relieved them individually of a total of $87. He did this some 50 feet from where the appellant remained, in turn, with 2 of the 3 Prosecution Witnesses, while the third was dealt with by Ah Man out of sight and hearing of the appell