Read the full judgment text of CACC 000419/2000 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 25 April 2001.
1. The applicant was charged in the District Court with 16 offences. The first twelve were charges that as an agent he used a document in each case with intent to deceive his principal, contrary to section 9(3) of the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance, Cap. 201. He was also charged with conspiracy to falsify an account, contrary to section 159A of the Crimes Ordinance, Cap. 200 and section 19(1)(a) of the Theft Ordinance, Cap. 210. This was charge 13. In addition to this he was charged with three