Society for Protection of the Harbour Ltd v. Town Planning Board

Read the full judgment text of HCAL 19/2003 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 5 December 2003.

1. On the 6th line of paragraph 16, it should read "Secondly, it cannot be seriously argued that the applicant brought these proceedings out of motive for private gain.".

Cited by 2 cases

Case No.HCAL 19/2003[2003] 2 HKLRD 787
Court
High Court CFI
Date05 Dec 2003
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCAL000019AM/2003

HCAL19/2003

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST
NO.19 OF 2003

---------------------

IN THE MATTER of an Application for Judicial Review by the Society for Protection of the Harbour Limited, pursuant to Order 53 of the Rules of the High Court

AND

IN THE MATTER of the Protection of The Harbour Ordinance (Cap.531)

AND

IN THE MATTER of the decisions of the Town Planning Board with regard to the Draft Wan Chai North Outline Zoning Plan No.S/H25/1 made on 6 December 2002 and 14 February 2003, pursuant to the Town Planning Ordinance (Cap.131)

---------------------

BETWEEN
SOCIETY FOR PROTECTION OF THE HARBOUR LIMITED Applicant
AND
TOWN PLANNING BOARD Respondent

----------------------

Coram: Hon Chu J in Court

Date of Hearing: 16 October 2003

Date of Decision: 5 December 2003

--------------------------------

CORRIGENDUM

--------------------------------

1. On the 6th line of paragraph 16, it should read "Secondly, it cannot be seriously argued that the applicant brought these proceedings out of motive for private gain.".

Rebecca Lai (Ms)
Clerk to the Honourable Madam Justice Chu
9 December 2003