Tridant Engineering Co. Ltd. v. Mansion Holdings Ltd.

Read the full judgment text of HCCT 3 & 66 of 1996 on BabelCite. This 高等法院原訟法庭 judgment was delivered on 15 June 2000 before Deputy High Court Judge To.

This judgment concerns construction and arbitration disputes between TRIDANT ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED and MANSION HOLDINGS LIMITED, as well as between MANSION FIRE ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED and TRIDANT ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED, heard in the High Court of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region's Court of First Instance. The hearing took place over several days from November 1999 to March 2000 with judgment rendered on 15 June 2000 by Deputy High Court Judge To. A corrigendum was issued on 22 June 2000 correcting various typographical and textual errors in the original judgment, including adjustments to figures with the insertion of the word “million” after specified dollar amounts and corrections of references to schedules within the judgment. No detailed legal issues, factual backgrounds, or outcomes are specified in the public corrigendum document. The case reflects complex procedural and substantive issues typical of high value construction and arbitration proceedings, although the detailed reasoning and final disposition are not provided in this document.

Case No.HCCT 3 & 66 of 1996
Court
高等法院原訟法庭
Date15 Jun 2000
JudgeDeputy High Court Judge To
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCCT000003CM/1996

HCCT 3 & 66 of 1996

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTRUCTION & ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS

NO. 3 & 66 OF 1996

____________

BETWEEN
TRIDANT ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED Plaintiff
AND
MANSION HOLDINGS LIMITED Defendant
AND BETWEEN
MANSION FIRE ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED Plaintiff
AND
TRIDANT ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED Defendant

____________

Coram: Deputy High Court Judge To in Court

Dates of Hearing: 15-17, 22-26, 29-30 November 1999 1, 3, 6-10, 13, 15-16 December 1999 1-2 March 2000

Date of Judgment: 15 June 2000

____________________

CORRIGENDUM

____________________

1. In the following items, repeal "as follow", and substitute "as follows" :-

i) on page 5, in the line N.

ii) on page 9, in the line J.

iii) on page 44, in the line M.

2. In the following items, insert the word "million"

i) on page 75, in the line Q, after "$4.87".

ii) on page 76, in the line F, after "$5.71".

iii) on page 86, in the line Q, after "$25.20".

iv) on page 86, in the line R, after "$6.83".

3. On page 93, in line J, after the word "totalling", repeal the word "and".

4. On page 113, in line T, repeal the word "Schedule 5" and substitute "Schedule 4".

5. On page 116, in the H, repeal the word "Schedule 6" and substitute "Schedule 5".

Dated this the 22 June 2000

( Vingo Cheung )
Clerk to Deputy High Court Judge To