Read the full judgment text of LDNT 000147/2000 on BabelCite. This LDNT judgment was delivered on 20 August 2001.
3. Mr. Poole acknowledged that the landlord was a good landlord and the Premises a nice flat. However, he also informed the Tribunal that in the course of his tenancies, he had undertaken to install two new bathrooms and carried out considerable improvements. At this juncture, the Tribunal advised him that the definition of the PMR under the Ordinance requires the Tribunal to consider the rental value of the Premises as at the relevant date. The Tribunal would not distinguish between the parties
Cited by 1 case