Read the full judgment text of CACC 16/1979 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 13 December 1979.
1. Counsel for the Appellant has conceded that there is no point he can properly argue upon the merits and he has confined himself to a technical objection to the trial. The Appellant was charged under s. 10(1)(b) of the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance, a section which appears in Part II of that O. By virtue of s. 31 the consent of the Attorney General was required for the institution of the prosecution and a form of consent was handed to the judge at the beginning of the trial. The contention i