Leung Kam Tong v. Suen Yuk Ying
Read the full judgment text of on BabelCite. was delivered on 20 January 1998.
1. Court: The Presiding Officer had heard all the evidence and had ruled on facts. She found as a fact that the Appellant had entered into the licence agreement without the authority of the 2nd and 3rd Defendants and she was not wrong in law in coming to the conclusion she reached. The appeal is therefore dismissed with costs to Defendant fixed at $500.00.
HCSA000014X/1997
[English Translation]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
SMALL CLAIMS TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO. 14 OF 1997
___________
| BETWEEN | ||
| LEUNG KAM TONG | Claimant/ (Respondent) |
|
| AND | ||
| SUEN YUK YING | Defendant/ (Appellant) |
____________
Coram: Deputy Judge Wesley Wong in Court
Date of Hearing: 20 January 1998
Date of Delivery of Judgment: 20 January 1998
____________
R U L I N G
____________
1. Court: The Presiding Officer had heard all the evidence and had ruled on facts. She found as a fact that the Appellant had entered into the licence agreement without the authority of the 2nd and 3rd Defendants and she was not wrong in law in coming to the conclusion she reached. The appeal is therefore dismissed with costs to Defendant fixed at $500.00.
| (Wesley Wong) | |
| Deputy Judge of the High Court |
Representation:
Appellant Ms. Suen Yuk Ying present in person.
Respondent Leung Kam Tong present in person.