Read the full judgment text of CACC 001029/1974 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment.
1. We will deal first with the appeal of the second Appellant against his convictions. He was convicted on five charges of obtaining property by deception, all these being charges which were laid against him jointly with the other Appellant. Counsel for the Crown finds himself unable to support the convictions on the third, fifth and eighth charges, and with respect to the learned judge we think counsel is right. The charges were based upon the dishonest obtaining of goods by false representatio