Cheung Hon Biu v. The Queen
Read the full judgment text of CACC 444/1971 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment.
1. The appellant pleaded guilty to smoking dangerous drugs and was sentenced to 9 months imprisonment.
|
CACC000444/1971 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 444 OF 1971 -----------------
----------------- Coram: Pickering, J. Date of Judgment: 6th August, 1971. ----------------- JUDGMENT ----------------- 1. The appellant pleaded guilty to smoking dangerous drugs and was sentenced to 9 months imprisonment. 2. On the appeal against that sentence he claimed that ten persons were arrested simultaneously for this same offence and that of the ten one was acquitted of the charge, seven were conditionally discharged and bound over, one received a sentence of 14 days imprisonment whilst he himself was sentenced to 9 months imprisonment. 3. Counsel for the Crown confirmed, and the original record revealed, that this was so. The appellant has only one previous conviction for possession of dangerous drugs and there is nothing in the Statement of Findings of the learned magistrate to suggest any reason for this discrepancy in the sentence imposed upon the appellant as against the very much more lenient treatment accorded to his eight companions. 4. It is inevitable that the appellant should feel an acute sense of grievance having been in prison since 15th June of this year and still having more than seven months of his sentence to run. 5. Disparity of sentence is not a ground upon which a Court of Appeal will necessarily interfere. See R. v. Richards(1) but in this instance the discrepancy is so very marked that I allow the appeal and set aside the sentence of 9 months imprisonment which will be substituted by a sentence of such length as will result in the appellant's immediate discharge from prison. Representation: Appellant in person Keil C.C. for Crown (1) 39 Cr. App. R191 |