The Incorporated Owners of No.10 Bonham Strand and Another v. HKSAR
Read the full judgment text of FAMC 41/2004 on BabelCite. This FAMC judgment was delivered on 27 October 2004.
1. Our having heard Mr Choy Bing Wing on behalf of the applicants should not be taken as an indication that someone in his position will in future be heard on behalf of parties in their position.
Cited by 2 cases
|
FAMC No. 41 of 2004 IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 41 OF 2004 (CRIMINAL) (ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL _____________________ Between:
_____________________ Appeal Committee: Mr Justice Bokhary PJ, Mr Justice Chan PJ and Mr Justice Ribeiro PJDate of Hearing: 27 October 2004 Date of Determination: 27 October 2004___________________________ D E T E R M I N A T I O N ___________________________ Mr Justice Bokhary PJ: 1.Our having heard Mr Choy Bing Wing on behalf of the applicants should not be taken as an indication that someone in his position will in future be heard on behalf of parties in their position. 2.Turning to the substance of the application, the arguments advanced in support of the application do not match the point certified by McMahon J. And no alternative point has been formulated with sufficient clarity to justify permitting it to be taken to the Court of Final Appeal. Accordingly leave to appeal is refused.
With the Appeal Committee’s permission, Mr Choy Bing Wing was heard on behalf of the applicants Mr John Reading SC and Ms Virginia Lau (of the Department of Justice) for the respondent |
Other judgments that cite this case