Yiu Yiu Nam, Tom v. HKSAR
Read the full judgment text of FAMC 42/2004 on BabelCite. This FAMC judgment was delivered on 5 November 2004.
1. No reasonably arguable point of law of great and general importance is involved. Nor is it reasonably arguable that anything done or omitted in the courts below constitutes a substantial or grave injustice whether in regard to conviction or in regard to sentence.
|
FAMC No. 42 of 2004 IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 42 OF 2004 (CRIMINAL) (ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM CACC NO. 438 OF 2002) Between:
_____________________ FAMC No. 48 of 2004 MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 48 OF 2004 (CRIMINAL) (ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM CACC NO. 438 OF 2002) Between:
_____________________ Appeal Committee: Mr Justice Bokhary PJ, Mr Justice Chan PJ and Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ Date of Hearing: 5 November 2004 Date of Determination: 5 November 2004 ______________________ DETERMINATION ______________________ Mr Justice Bokhary PJ: 1.No reasonably arguable point of law of great and general importance is involved. Nor is it reasonably arguable that anything done or omitted in the courts below constitutes a substantial or grave injustice whether in regard to conviction or in regard to sentence. 2.Both of these applications are dismissed.
Mr Peter Duncan SC and Mr Trevor Beel (instructed by Messrs Peter Mo & Co.) for the applicant in FAMC No. 42 of 2004 Mr Y.C. Yeung (instructed by Messrs Christine M. Koo & Ip) for the applicant in FAMC No. 48 of 2004 Mr Peter Callaghan (instructed by the Department of Justice) for the respondent in both applications |
Further hearings and rulings under FAMC 42/2004