HKSAR v. Li Suet Ping

Read the full judgment text of CACC 542/2002 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 9 November 2004.

1. On 17 October 2002 this applicant was convicted of the offence of murder.  The application for leave to appeal against conviction was dismissed by this Court on 21 June 2004.  She now seeks leave to appeal against sentence.

Cited by 1 case

Case No.CACC 542/2002
Court
Court of Appeal
Date09 Nov 2004
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACC 542/2002

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 542 OF 2002

(ON APPEAL FROM HCCC NO. 160 OF 2001)

______________________

BETWEEN

  HKSAR Respondent
  and  
  LI SUET PING 李雪冰 Applicant

______________________

Before : Hon Stock JA and Gall J in Court

Date of Hearing : 9 November 2004

Date of Judgment : 9 November 2004

_________________

J U D G M E N T

_________________

Hon Stock JA (giving the judgment of the Court):

1.On 17 October 2002 this applicant was convicted of the offence of murder.  The application for leave to appeal against conviction was dismissed by this Court on 21 June 2004.  She now seeks leave to appeal against sentence.

2.She has provided us with an account of an unhappy marital life and has given us an account of the suggested events leading up to her husband’s death.  The events leading up to his death were the subject of the trial and the appeal against conviction, and this Court is now concerned only with the issue of sentence.  So, too, the applicant has sought, in effect, to recanvass matters raised on appeal against conviction.  She asks us to impose a determinant sentence.  As she appreciates in her homemade grounds of appeal against sentence, the sentence for the offence of murder is fixed by law at life imprisonment and that is the sentence imposed by the trial judge.  There are therefore no valid grounds of appeal against sentence.  Furthermore, Section 83G of the Criminal Procedure Ordinance precludes an appeal against sentence where the sentence is fixed by law.  Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal against sentence is dismissed.

(Frank Stock) (T.M. Gall)
Justice of Appeal Judge of the Court of First Instance

Applicant in person (re: Sentence)

Mr D G Saw, SC, DDPP leading Ms Peggy Lo, GC of the Department of Justice for the Respondent

Cited by 1 case

Other judgments that cite this case

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under CACC 542/2002