HKSAR v. Cheon Wan Kam
Read the full judgment text of CACC 445/2001 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 25 July 2002.
1. The case against the applicant was overwhelming as can be seen from the Reasons for Verdict. The applicant has spent over two hours commenting on points of detail on the findings of fact made by the Judge. Nothing that he has said has led me to believe that there are any good grounds of appeal against his conviction.
Cites 1 case
|
CACC000445/2001 CACC 445/2001 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 445 OF 2001 (ON APPEAL FROM DCCC 325 OF 2001) ______________
______________ Coram: Hon Mayo VP in Court Date of Hearing: 25 July 2002 Date of Judgment: 25 July 2002 _______________ J U D G M E N T _______________ 1.The case against the applicant was overwhelming as can be seen from the Reasons for Verdict. The applicant has spent over two hours commenting on points of detail on the findings of fact made by the Judge. Nothing that he has said has led me to believe that there are any good grounds of appeal against his conviction. 2.Also the sentence imposed was in no way excessive or wrong in principle. 3.Both applications for leave to appeal against conviction and sentence are dismissed.
Representation: Mr Martin Hui, SGC, of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent. Applicant in person. |
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under CACC 445/2001