Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 000031/2003 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 17 November 2004.
1. This is a claim for goods sold and delivered. The 1 st defendant (“Wing Hong”) was a contractor undertaking repair and maintenance work at various Government offices for the Architectural Services Department (“ASD”). It subcontracted the whole contract to the 2 nd defendant (“Tai Fong”). The plaintiff (“Décor”) was a supplier of carpeting. There is no dispute that in late 2001 and early 2002 Décor supplied carpet tiles and laid them in various Government offices, and that it is now owed money
Cited by 1 case