Chan Tung Loi and Another v. Wing Hong Contractors Ltd and Others

Read the full judgment text of on BabelCite. was delivered on 24 November 2004.

1. At paragraph 1 on page 1, the 2 nd line should read:

Case No.
Court
Date24 Nov 2004
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCA1751/2002

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTIONNO. 1751 OF 2002

______________________

BETWEEN

   CHAN TUNG LOI and TSOI CHI YIN trading as Plaintiffs
   TUNG YIN CIIVIL ENGINEERING COMPANY  
   (東賢土木工程公司)  
  and  
  WING HONG CONTRACTORS LIMITED 1st Defendant
  (榮康建築有限公司)  
  KO YING TONG 2nd Defendant
  CHAN TSANG KWOK 3rd Defendant

______________________

Before : Hon Chu J in court

Date of Hearing : 10 - 14 May 2004

Date of Judgment : 24 November 2004

Date of Corrigendum :  25 November 2004

_______________

CORRIGENDUM

_______________

1.At paragraph 1 on page 1, the 2nd line should read:

“the sum of HK$797,900, being the balance of the price of work done”.

2.At paragraph 17 on page 6, the 3rd line should read:

“foreman of Wing Hong and was in charge of the Sheung Shui site on behalf”.

3.At paragraph 26 on page 9, the 1st line should read:

“Siu also denied that he had on one occasion given cash to TK Chan”. 

4.At paragraph 28 on page 10, the 6th line should read:

“for and on behalf of Wing Hong. Secondly, the 2nd Quotation likewise did”.  

5.At paragraph 31 on page 11, the 3rd line should read:

“are subcontractors of Wing Hong. That being the case, there is no”.

6.At paragraph 32 at page 12, the 5th line should read:

“documents.  It is also most unlikely that the plaintiffs’ legal advisers would”.     

7.At paragraph 36 at page 13, the 9th line should read:

“subcontracts on behalf of his principal: see Armages Ltd v. Mundogas S.A.”.

   (S.M. Kwan)
  Clerk to The Honourable Madam Justice Chu