HKSAR v. Koo Chuk Fong
Read the full judgment text of HCMA 1107/2004 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 22 December 2004.
1. I have considered the six grounds of appeal raised by the appellant and also the submissions made orally to me this morning. I cannot say that these grounds lead me to the conclusion that the conviction is unsafe or unsatisfactory. The magistrate was entitled to say that because of the discrepancy on the speed the appellant was driving at existing between his interview with the police and his evidence in court she drew the irresistible inference that the appellant was driving without due ca
|
HCMA1107/2004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Appellate Jurisdiction) MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO.1107 OF 2004 (ON APPEAL FROM STS 9529 OF 2003) ______________________ BETWEEN
______________________ Before : Hon Nguyen J in Court Date of Hearing : 22 December 2004 Date of Judgment : 22 December 2004 ________________ J U D G M E N T ________________ 1.I have considered the six grounds of appeal raised by the appellant and also the submissions made orally to me this morning. I cannot say that these grounds lead me to the conclusion that the conviction is unsafe or unsatisfactory. The magistrate was entitled to say that because of the discrepancy on the speed the appellant was driving at existing between his interview with the police and his evidence in court she drew the irresistible inference that the appellant was driving without due care and attention. 2.Appeal dismissed.
Ms Anna Lai, SGC, of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent Appellant in person |