Power Trading & Engineering Co (China) (A Firm) v. Nippon Kanzai Center Co Ltd
Read the full judgment text of HCA 3960/2002 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 4 January 2005.
9. Before me, Mr Ng gave evidence to verify the amount due. On the part of the Defendant, there was no evidence called. Although in the witness statement of Mr Nakamura filed by the Defendant, it was suggested that there was some dispute on the quantum of the amount due, as Mr Nakamura did not give evidence his witness statement could not be referred to and there is no admissible evidence before me to contradict the evidence of Mr Ng.
Cites 1 case
|
HCA 3960/2002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE ACTION NO. 3960 OF 2002 ____________ BETWEEN
____________ Before: Recorder Edward Chan, SC in Court Date of Hearing: 4 January 2005 Date of Judgment: 4 January 2005 ___________________ C O R R I G E N D U M ___________________ Kindly note that Judgment of 4 January 2005 at page 4, paragraph 10, last line, “13 September 1999” should be repealed and replaced by “9 December 1998”. Dated this 11th day of January 2005
against Beijing Junefield. However there is no admissible evidence before me in this respect. 9.Before me, Mr Ng gave evidence to verify the amount due. On the part of the Defendant, there was no evidence called. Although in the witness statement of Mr Nakamura filed by the Defendant, it was suggested that there was some dispute on the quantum of the amount due, as Mr Nakamura did not give evidence his witness statement could not be referred to and there is no admissible evidence before me to contradict the evidence of Mr Ng. 10.In the circumstances, I find that the amount due to the Plaintiff was as claimed by the Plaintiff and I will give judgment for the Plaintiff in the sum as claimed i.e. US$183,993.88 or its Hong Kong dollar equivalent at the time of payment with interest at 1% above the Hong Kong dollar prime rate of the HSBC from 9 December 1998 to the date hereof. 11.There will also be cost to the Plaintiff.
Mr Joeson Wong, instructed by Messrs Chan & Chan, for the Plaintiff Defendant in person, absent Third Party in person, absent |
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under HCA 3960/2002