Power Trading & Engineering Co (China) (A Firm) v. Nippon Kanzai Center Co Ltd

Read the full judgment text of HCA 3960/2002 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 4 January 2005.

9. Before me, Mr Ng gave evidence to verify the amount due.  On the part of the Defendant, there was no evidence called.  Although in the witness statement of Mr Nakamura filed by the Defendant, it was suggested that there was some dispute on the quantum of the amount due, as Mr Nakamura did not give evidence his witness statement could not be referred to and there is no admissible evidence before me to contradict the evidence of Mr Ng.

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCA 3960/2002
Court
High Court CFI
Date04 Jan 2005
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCA 3960/2002

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO. 3960 OF 2002

____________

BETWEEN

  POWER TRADING & ENGINEERING
CO. (CHINA) (A FIRM)
Plaintiff
  and  
  NIPPON KANZAI CENTER COMPANY LIMITED Defendant
  and  
  BEJING JUNEFIELD REAL ESTATE Third Party
  DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED  

____________

Before: Recorder Edward Chan, SC in Court

Date of Hearing: 4 January 2005

Date of Judgment: 4 January 2005

___________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

___________________

Kindly note that Judgment of 4 January 2005 at page 4, paragraph 10, last line, “13 September 1999” should be repealed and replaced by “9 December 1998”.

Dated this 11th day of January 2005

  ( Vingo Cheung )
  Clerk to Recorder Edward Chan SC

against Beijing Junefield.  However there is no admissible evidence before me in this respect.

9.Before me, Mr Ng gave evidence to verify the amount due.  On the part of the Defendant, there was no evidence called.  Although in the witness statement of Mr Nakamura filed by the Defendant, it was suggested that there was some dispute on the quantum of the amount due, as Mr Nakamura did not give evidence his witness statement could not be referred to and there is no admissible evidence before me to contradict the evidence of Mr Ng.

10.In the circumstances, I find that the amount due to the Plaintiff was as claimed by the Plaintiff and I will give judgment for the Plaintiff in the sum as claimed i.e. US$183,993.88 or its Hong Kong dollar equivalent at the time of payment with interest at 1% above the Hong Kong dollar prime rate of the HSBC from 9 December 1998 to the date hereof.

11.There will also be cost to the Plaintiff.

  (Edward Chan, SC)
  Recorder of Court of First Instance
  of the High Court

Mr Joeson Wong, instructed by Messrs Chan & Chan, for the Plaintiff

Defendant in person, absent

Third Party in person, absent

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCA 3960/2002