Koo Po-kan v. The Queen
Read the full judgment text of CACC 1030/1979 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 15 January 1980.
1. The Appellant and his friend held up the cashiers of a supermarket with a knife. It is fair to say that at the outset it was not the Appellant who held the knife, but his friend. However when his friend dropped it in the scuffle that ensued when other staff came to the help of the cashiers the Appellant made sure he picked it up. He took it with him as he ran away and used it to some effect upon the stomach of one of the constables who eventually caught him.
|
CACC001030/1979 [Sentence varied on particular facts of the case.]
----------------- Coram: Huggins, J.A., Cons and Yang, JJ. Date of Judgment: 15 January 1980 ----------------- JUDGMENT ----------------- Cons, J.: 1. The Appellant and his friend held up the cashiers of a supermarket with a knife. It is fair to say that at the outset it was not the Appellant who held the knife, but his friend. However when his friend dropped it in the scuffle that ensued when other staff came to the help of the cashiers the Appellant made sure he picked it up. He took it with him as he ran away and used it to some effect upon the stomach of one of the constables who eventually caught him. 2. The learned trial judge sentenced him to a total of 5½ years on the various offences on which he was charged and ordered that period to be consecutive to a sentence of 5 years that the Appellant was currently serving for an attempted robbery of which he had been convicted only a few days earlier. That made a total of 10½ years. 3. Mr. Barretto, who appears for the Appellant, submits that if the two sets of offences had been tried together the cumulative total would not have been set as high as that. We agree. We think it would have been set at 6 or 7 years. And bearing in mind that the present offences were committed while the Appellant was on bail for the earlier offence we think 7 years is more appropriate. That can best be achieved in the present circumstances by increasing the sentences on the first two charges to 7 years each, that is the robbery and wounding charges, but making them run concurrently to each other and to all the other sentences in this or the earlier case. 4. We therefore give leave to appeal against sentence, allow the appeal and vary the sentences accordingly. Representation: R. Barretto (Director of Legal Aid) assigned for the Appellant. G.W. Alderdice, Counsel for the Crown/Respondent. |