Read the full judgment text of HCMA 001224/2004 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 26 January 2005.
1. Each of the three Appellants was convicted, after trial, of a single charge of conspiracy to defraud. The First Appellant was alleged to have conspired with the Fourth Accused in court below, who was also convicted, but has not appealed. The Second Appellant was alleged to have entered into a separate conspiracy with the Fourth Accused. The Third Appellant was convicted of having conspired with another, named, person who was not charged. In due course, each of the three Appellants was sent