Cheung Kim Chau v. Lau Luen and Another

Read the full judgment text of HCA 1898/2002 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 22 December 2004.

Case No.HCA 1898/2002
Court
High Court CFI
Date22 Dec 2004
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCA1898/2002

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO.1898 OF 2002

-------------------------------

BETWEEN

  CHEUNG KIM CHAU (張劍秋) Plaintiff
  and  
  LAU LUEN (劉暖) 1st Defendant
  WOO CHU (胡珠) 2nd Defendant

-------------------------------

Before : Hon Tang J in Court

Date of Hearing : 23-26 and 30 November 2004

Date of Judgment : 22 December 2004

Date of Corrigendum : 17 February 2005

 

------------------------------------

C O R R I G E N D U M

-------------------------------------

1. At paragraph 22 on page 7, the 3rd & 4th lines should read :
  the 2nd Defendant could have done better”.
     
2. At paragraph 26 on page 9, the 7th line should read :
  for the total amount of $160,000”.
     
3. At paragraph 33 on page 12, the 3rd line should read :
  of bronze sensors and bronze and ceramic statutes”.
     
4. At paragraph 40 on page 14, the 3rd & 4th lines should read :
  I have no doubt that he would have insisted, as he said he did in the presence of the plaintiff”.
     
5. At paragraph 42 on page 15, the 8th & 9th lines should read :
  all these payments had been satisfactorily accounted for”.
     
6. At paragraph 51 on page 17, the 8th & 9th lines should read :
  apparently a one-month supply of small change”.
     
7. At paragraph 64 on page 23, the 10th line should read :
  The 1st defendant’s explanation as to the paid capital”.
     
8. At paragraph 65 on page 24, the 8th  line should read :
  for breach of that agreement even though”.
     
9. At paragraph 65 on page 24, the 13th & 14th  lines should read :
  the plaintiff had failed to prove”.

  (Janet KWAN)
  for Registrar, High Court