|
HCA1898/2002
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
ACTION NO.1898 OF 2002
-------------------------------
BETWEEN
| |
CHEUNG KIM CHAU (張劍秋) |
Plaintiff |
| |
and |
|
| |
LAU LUEN (劉暖) |
1st Defendant |
| |
WOO CHU (胡珠) |
2nd Defendant |
-------------------------------
Before : Hon Tang J in Court
Date of Hearing : 23-26 and 30 November 2004
Date of Judgment : 22 December 2004
Date of Corrigendum : 17 February 2005
------------------------------------
C O R R I G E N D U M
-------------------------------------
| 1. |
At paragraph 22 on page 7, the 3rd & 4th lines should read : |
| |
“ |
the 2nd Defendant could have done better”. |
| |
|
|
| 2. |
At paragraph 26 on page 9, the 7th line should read : |
| |
“ |
for the total amount of $160,000”. |
| |
|
|
| 3. |
At paragraph 33 on page 12, the 3rd line should read : |
| |
“ |
of bronze sensors and bronze and ceramic statutes”. |
| |
|
|
| 4. |
At paragraph 40 on page 14, the 3rd & 4th lines should read : |
| |
“ |
I have no doubt that he would have insisted, as he said he did in the presence of the plaintiff”. |
| |
|
|
| 5. |
At paragraph 42 on page 15, the 8th & 9th lines should read : |
| |
“ |
all these payments had been satisfactorily accounted for”. |
| |
|
|
| 6. |
At paragraph 51 on page 17, the 8th & 9th lines should read : |
| |
“ |
apparently a one-month supply of small change”. |
| |
|
|
| 7. |
At paragraph 64 on page 23, the 10th line should read : |
| |
“ |
The 1st defendant’s explanation as to the paid capital”. |
| |
|
|
| 8. |
At paragraph 65 on page 24, the 8th line should read : |
| |
“ |
for breach of that agreement even though”. |
| |
|
|
| 9. |
At paragraph 65 on page 24, the 13th & 14th lines should read : |
| |
“ |
the plaintiff had failed to prove”. |
| |
(Janet KWAN) |
| |
for Registrar, High Court |
|
Summaries and metadata are generated from the judgment. Report an error
Other Judgments in This Case
Further hearings and rulings under HCA 1898/2002