Read the full judgment text of CACC 000339/2004 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 17 February 2005.
1. On 30 June 2004, the applicants (D1, D2, D3 and D5 respectively) were all convicted on the 1 st charge, following a trial in the District Court before Judge Yuen, of conspiracy to steal Buddhist pines or parts of such trees, contrary to section 9 of the Theft Ordinance, Cap. 210 and section 159A of the Crimes Ordinance, Cap. 200. Charges 2 and 3 were alternative charges of handling the same goods which were ordered to remain on the file. The judge also convicted D1 on the 4 th charge, which
Cites 1 case