HKSAR v. Liu Wah King
Read the full judgment text of CACC 88/2004 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 3 August 2004.
1. I shall grant the applicant leave in this case simply because, on balance, I think that the point that he raises deserves to be heard. I have made it clear to him that that is not to be equated with any assessment of his chances of success. The point that seems to me deserves a hearing is his comparison with the case of R v Chan Sui-to and another [1996] 2 HKCLR 128.
Cites 1 case
|
CACC 88/2004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 88 OF 2004 (ON APPEAL FROM DCCC NO. 37 OF 2004) ---------------------- BETWEEN
-------------------- Before : Hon Stock JA in Court Dates of Hearing : 3 August 2004 Date of Judgment : 3 August 2004 ---------------------- J U D G M E N T ---------------------- Hon Stock JA: 1.I shall grant the applicant leave in this case simply because, on balance, I think that the point that he raises deserves to be heard. I have made it clear to him that that is not to be equated with any assessment of his chances of success. The point that seems to me deserves a hearing is his comparison with the case of R v Chan Sui-to and another [1996] 2 HKCLR 128.
Applicant, LIU WAH KING, in person Mr Jackson Poon, SGC of the Department of Justice for the Respondent |
Cases cited in this judgment