Read the full judgment text of CACC 000455/1980 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment.
1. The appellant was tried before the District Court upon eighteen charges taken under various sections of the Theft Ordinance and the Companies Ordinance. Three of the charges involve two other persons who were tried together with him but who were acquitted at the end of the case. The appellant was convicted upon all charges. He received sentences totalling five and a half years' imprisonment. He appealed against his convictions only on Charges 1 to 14 inclusive and against the sentences impose