Yu Kam Por v. New Central Ltd

DCCJ7038/2002

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

CIVIL ACTION NO. 7038 OF 2002

--------------------

BETWEEN

--------------------

Coram : Her Honour Judge C.B. Chan in Court

Dates of Trial : 25^th to 27^th October 2004

Date of Handing down Judgment : 10^th January 2005

CORRIGENDA

1.In the 7th line of paragraph 2, ‘or “the Land’’ or “the Property”’ shouldbe added after ‘“the Land in Question’’’.

2.In the 2nd line of paragraph 7(4), ‘above’ should read ‘of the Statement of Claim’.

3.In the 1st line of paragraph 16, ‘but’ shouldbe deleted. 

4.In the 2nd line of paragraph 30, ‘land’ should read ‘the Land in Question’.

5.In the 2nd line of paragraph 33, ‘the Deceased and’ shouldbe deleted. 

6.In the 6th line of paragraph 38, ‘brother’ shouldbe inserted between ‘younger’ and ‘could’.

7.In the 6th line of paragraph 44, ‘New Central’ should read ‘the Defendant’.

8.In the 24th line of paragraph 46, ‘land’ should read ‘Land in Question’.

9.In the 9th line of paragraph 47, ‘whether’ should read ‘where’.

10.In the 6th line of paragraph 50, ‘unexercised’ shouldbe inserted between ‘an’ and ‘option’.

11.In the 6th line of paragraph 57, ‘land’ should read ‘Land in Question’.

12.In the 9th line of paragraph 57, ‘takes’ should read ‘costs’.

13.In the 10th line of paragraph 57, ‘have’ should read ‘the Defendant has’.

14.In the 11th line of paragraph 57, ‘have’ should read ‘and has’.

15.In the 3rd line of paragraph 58, ‘the’ after ‘know’ should be deleted.

16.In the 6th line of paragraph 61, ‘2001’ should read ‘1998’.

17.In the 10th line of paragraph 63, both ‘Mr.Yu’ should read ‘the     Deceased’.

18.In the 9th line of paragraph 68, ‘has’ should read ‘have’.

19.In the 10th line of paragraph 68, ‘unexercised’ shouldbe inserted between ‘an’ and ‘option’.

Dated the 28th day of April 2005