Read the full judgment text of HCMA 000031/2005 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 22 March 2005.
1. The Appellant, Rai Danesh, faced 4 charges: The first charge was one of trafficking in a dangerous drug, contrary to sections 4(1)(a) and 3 of the Dangerous Drugs Ordinance, the dangerous drugs there being 3.09 grammes of cannabis resin. The 2nd charge, which was a re-amended charge, was one of one of possession of a dangerous drug, contrary to sections 8(1)(a) and 2 of the Dangerous Drugs Ordinance, the drugs there were 18.74 grammes of cannabis resin. The 3rd charge was one of traffickin
Cited by 3 cases